
ART
REVIEW;
By KEN JOHNSON
Published: July 25, 2003
With
heightened intuitions and the ability to translate abstract ideas into visual
terms, artists are often expected to make sense out of science. In this vein
genetics and DNA have been popular topics for group exhibitions in recent years.
As it happens, James Watson and Francis Crick discovered the double-helix
structure of DNA 50 years ago, and so the
Though
not without entertainment value, the show does not make a very good case for
artists as interpreters of science. The unfocused grab bag of more or less
symbolic images in many mediums includes Alexis Rockman's
painting of a creepy, prehistoric lagoon; Tom Otterness's
bronze cartoon sculpture of a DNA molecule; a field of cellular forms drawn by
Alexander Ross; a long piece of knotted monofilament by Tom Friedman; a pattern
painting repeating the image of a cobra by Phillip Taaffe;
a photograph of hands with finger and palm prints emphasized by Gary Schneider;
and much more work of far less aesthetic interest.
All
works come with labels explaining precisely how they represent principles of
DNA science.
Some
artists, like Suzanne Anker, give the impression of knowing a great deal about
genetics; others don't seem to know much more than what you'd glean from
newspaper headlines. Either way, one feels that the often fanciful artistic
element does more to get in the way of understanding the relevant issues --
scientific, sociological, mythological and otherwise -- than to illuminate
them.
This
is also true of the big, lavishly produced photographic montages by Kevin
Clarke featured here in a solo show. Mr. Clarke makes portraits of people by
layering sequences of alphabetic DNA symbols and images of objects associated
with the subject.